Whoohoo. I just finished my History of Dress exam; which was freaking retarded because we basically had to write five points for every image flashed on screen within five minutes... except I can't think a point and write it down per minute.. and then there were seven comparison images with seven points each. My hand just died. It was a retarded exam. Oh well. I am done with that class.
I did enjoy the class though my prof was pretty sketchy (he couldn't spell things on the spot... hm.... he can't spell french terms either. We asked him how to spell 'Rocaille' and he was like "uh... r-o-c-a... it's on one of your sheets." Today right before the test, someone asked him how to spell 'ormolu' and he told us to refer to the sheets. SKETCHY). Anyway I hope I have all my facts right despite his incompetence in spelling. I couldn't even find some of the paintings he wrote down (I presume he just made up a name for them??)
I enjoyed the class in ways because it really has helped me learn about a subject I'm interested in and now Bonnie and I literally walk around and point out different characteristics of clothing we see in stores and tell each other where each element was derived from.
It's also interesting because fashion is not just surface: it really does embody political and social ideas of an everchanging culture. It also proves to feminists that men are not the ones who made women wear corsets and heeled shoes: actually it was men who wore corsets first back in the early 19th century with the dandys, and Louis X111 created the high heeled shoe because he was short. HAhaha.. it was then appropriated into court dress where a red block heel shoe was only worn by royalty (and you thought the current Christian Louboutin made that up).
It's also useful because now when I observe a painting, I can try to tell what period it came from without looking at dates by examining the garments that the figures are wearing. I can tell you what revolution was happening and why they reverted back to this state of dress or the other. I can tell you that after the French revolution when Napolean came into power and Marie Antoinette had her head chopped off, vertical column dresses with empire line waists came into style which symbolized a desire for naturalistic elements as opposed to the frivolity and excess of the 18th century. They reverted back to clothes that reminded them of the Greeks- white column dresses:a symbol of democracy. Also in 1764, the ruins of Pompeii were discovered which also affected dress. Apparently at the turn of every century, we always revert back to a state of Greek dressing. Weird.
Unlike what we think today, menswear was always MORE advanced than women's fashion. Women's fashion always followed men's fashion. What I'm wearing today (white blouse with poet sleeves, jeans and boots) would have been considered dressing in drag exactly 100 years ago in the early 19th century when men wore waistcoats, cravats, breeches and tailcoat. Men used to pose like women do now: contra posto in an 'S' curve. It was men who were admired for their beauty, not women. Men used to care how they dressed, how they posed, how tall their hats were. So to say that women care too much about clothes now, well, just look a hundred years ago and you'll see the exact opposite was true.
Okay I'm going to stop. But all I'm trying to say that fashion is not as simplistic as one usually thinks it is: it traces way way back to Adam and Eve. It strives to express certain ideals of the body in relation to its surroundings.
Anyway after the one hour exam, I went to Daytona Trimmings (this huge store full of lace, ribbons, buttons, embroidery thread etc) and bought $15 worth of ribbons and buttons. HAHAHA. I just went nuts, "I want one yard of this, two yards of this- no make that three." I plan to wrap gifts with them and use them at home when I sew.
Whoohoo I plan to visit my dear friend Tanya at Ryerson to see what the Ryerson fashion program is like. :) I'm excited.
You know what I find funny is that though New York is a glamazon, we don't have any semi formals or dances like any other normal university back at home.
I'm also quite tired of my so called 'liberal, open minded' university which only emphasize homosexuality, feminism and so forth. The other day at my lecture class, the prof said that New York has just passed a law where you can CHOOSE your gender even if you haven't had a sex change. So technically I can change my birth cert to say "male" even though I don't get my breasts sucked out and my voice boxed tweaked. What the heck. Just because I "feel" like changing my sex, I apparently have the ability to. And then she goes on saying how that opens up many new questions about whether a male can marry a girl when he changes his sex to 'female' and whether or not that is lesbianism. At that point I was pretty annoyed because we're making a big deal out of something that was pre ordained. This, my friends, is what we call MIND BODY DUALISM. I hope no one in that lecture agreed with such a stupid law: honestly if they tote this idea of mind-body unification, they certainly should disagree with this new law. Gender picking is a waste of time. I'm glad that my tax dollars is going to a great cause. -_-
So I found out last night that two of my toes are eggplant purple. They've bruised and it really hurts to walk. I realized that these things always come at the worst of times: I NEED to walk in New York and yet I now have a slight limp. If you've ever walked with me, you know I like to walk really fast and my bruises are now causing me to walk at normal people pace. I don't like it. I went to B&H today, a 35,000 square foot camera and film store (yes it's huge especially since it's in Manhattan) and I was so tempted to buy that Nikon D40 camera for $600.... I called my dad and he said "why not" but I thought impulse buying would not be wise although I did want to get it to bring it home and let my dad teach me how to use it. It's considerably smaller and lighter than my dad's D70; the one I've been toting around this past summer. I really want it but the thing that's holding me back is entirely superficial. I mean with $600, I could get other things and those things that pop into my head are entirely superficial fluff that if I dared to utter aloud, I think we'd need a few smelling salts. Yeah so a camera is functional, and practical: something I could be proud to say I spent $600 on rather than say, other things....
Perhaps I'll just get it when I come back when I'm entirely certain.
Why am I so afraid of the superficial?
I was blog surfing the other day and I realized that people have such lengthy friends lists and I only have Tania and two other unlisted links. I should really alter those. But in the end, my list would be extremely short- about ten people. The more I think about it, the less of an ENFP I feel I am. I like being around people but being in New York is making me dislike being around people. I also am not really into being in big groups of people, I end up not talking and thinking how retarded people are. And I see that people have 20-30 people on their list, I wonder how well they know these people. Is it more than just a parade of popularity?
You know what.. sometimes I think that when in times of sadness, depression, bitterness, it is those time when I write the best posts because they come from something deep down. It's a time where I am able to do some self reflection and within myself, draw out some conclusion as to why I am feeling so insecure and sad. I've been reading old summer entries, and wish that I had the time to think and almost wish that I was that sad in order to write something great and worthy of posting. Not just superficial, day to day stuff, but something truly meaningful.
As our world is coming to an end (yes look at the weather), I realize that something must be done with all the environmental devastation that we have reeked upon this earth- a gift which we have drastically beaten to a pulp. People often give me a quizzical look when I tell them I'm studying 'sustainability' (at this point, I have no courses in sustainable design because they're all freaking full: how am I supposed to 'save the world' if I cant' get the courses I need). Last week in Intro To Design, the prof talked about Sustainability and Design. If you think about it, all that has happened in this world: pollution, clear cutting, industrial waste is all a result of failure in design. And though the word 'designer' may seem like fluff, it is the designer who in the end has to decide which path to take: one that 99% of people have trodden on- to the path of the easy life of old ideas and things that already exist or the path that many have not taken which is the path of sustainability. Because sustainability requires innovation, time and careful examination of the world and the people, designers often become lazy. This path takes work and time, something most of us don't care to invest in.
But truly, if you think about it, sustainability is where the money pot is lying in. Though it doesn't seem likely, when we examine global warming and the freakishly warm weather we're getting in mid december, we can already see the need for design to change for the better. Another interesting aspect of sustainable design is the need for cross major collabration: engineers will have to collaborate with fashion designers. Perhaps one day I'll be working with biologists and chemists to create new fabrics. Fashion will no longer stand alone in its own industry.
The reason I want to study sustainability is because I'm quite alarmed by how quickly our earth is disintegrating. I wish we had garbage bags that decomposed in two days rather than plastic garbage bags. That should be something someone should invent. I also want to do something that's more than just fabric- for a good cause. I also realize that most people think sustainable fashion is an oxymoron for hippies who wear burlap sacks and think it's chic. But it's incredibly hard. I want everything to be for the better from fair-paid workers to environmentally clean factories to eco friendly transporation to stores to the clothes themselves. There are so many compenents that have to be thought out and invented. That is a lot of work considering nothing of the sort has been done. It reminds me of the copper mines outside of Toronto.. we did a case study on it in gr9 and I can't remember what it's called but they basically created eco friendly factories and sold the idea to companies all around.
But all that I do, even if it's not sustainable fashion, I want to do it for God. Okay I admit it would be great to be famous and financially successful, but I really want to do it because of Him. I'm always examining the China market and how it's evolving to sustainable products and innovation for future references. I've concluded that I can't do couture because sustainable couture is almost an oxymoron: sustainable design only affordable for the rich. It would be great to be able to price my work at $10,000+ but I think sustainable design is only successful on a mass market level. If I could do something like another H&M but have it sustainable and environmentally friendly, that would be something I'd like to achieve. But I don't want people buying it because it's eco friendly, I want them to buy it for the design. If I just stressed on the eco part of it, and people bought it out of the goodness or shame of their consumeristic desires, then the company would not be able to survive. Design first.
This is hard, and I don't know if it's achievable but it's something to aspire to.